CLICK HERE FOR FREE SUBSCRIPTION


Issue 4 - June 09

Contents

Overview
- Planning for Sustainability - Low Carbon, High Bureaucracy

Q&A
- Anna Halcro-Johnston - The Carbon Trust

Case Studies
- Quattro Design Architects
- Eight Associates
- Pitman Tozer Architects
- Mackellar Architecture Limited
- Geoff Beardsley & Partners Limited

Technology and products
- Sustainable timber structures
- Photovoltaics
- Financial services
- Solar thermal heating

 

Welcome to issue four of the Low Energy Buildings Bulletin.

In this issue, we'll be paying particular attention to the role and work of architects in low carbon buildings and sustainable design. We have an overview article from a director of an architectural firm, Luke Tozer, who discusses some of the unseen bureaucratic problems that arise during the planning process and what needs to be done to achieve the government's 2050 carbon reduction targets.

We have a Q&A with Anna Halcro-Johnston of the Carbon Trust, who explains the details of the Department of Energy and Climate Change-funded Low Carbon Buildings Programme, as well as other areas of the Carbon Trust's work.

This issue's case studies focus on architectural firms and an environmental consultancy company. We examine the environmental policies of these organisations and look at how they are working towards sustainable design, including examples of energy efficient projects they have worked on.

Finally, our regular Technology, Products and Services section explores some of the latest innovations from within the sector.

If you have any feedback or suggestions for future articles, case studies or Q&A figures, please don't hesitate to get in contact: tristan@carbon-innovation.com

Tristan Parker
Editor

Planning for Sustainability - Low Carbon, High Bureaucracy

By Luke Tozer.

The government target of an 80% reduction in UK carbon emissions from 1990 levels by 2050 is deliverable in theory, but requires a step change in the ability of local authority planning departments to deliver schemes that can help achieve this.

My experience as an architect is that there's a huge gap between the laudable emissions from central government and the ability of overstretched local planning authorities to carry them out. At the national scale there is clearly a need to deliver a decarbonised electricity grid (nuclear power, renewables, etc.) but in terms of the built environment at a more local level there's the issue of how individuals can reduce energy consumption in their homes and workplaces, and how local and national government can help deliver this.

Recent efforts to encourage loft insulation and use of low energy light bulbs are easy gains but the more necessary and significant alterations to building fabric, and the way people use the built environment, are more difficult to deliver. The planning system is ill-equipped to deliver this kind of change, both at the large and the small scale.

One reason for this is the democratic nature of planning, which makes it subject to the whims of local politics and interest groups. Other than in large infrastructure projects which now have their own rules, the vast majority of planning decisions, from supermarkets to house extensions, are subject to intense local scrutiny and opposition. This is essential and vital to retain the sense of place that people value so highly. It's also one of the few areas where most people feel engaged and able to effect action, and so in an era of increasing cynicism about politicians, a seat on the planning committee is perhaps one of the most effective and coveted ways a politician can make a demonstrable difference.

The powerful 'NIMBY' instinct acts as a brake on innovation. Not many people think that cladding a Victorian brick terrace with insulation and render is acceptable, however much it improves the environmental performance. This makes the planning system slow and unpredictable as a way of delivering the changes needed. In the battle between conservation and environmental performance, the preservation instinct wins every time: "We need low energy buildings, sure, just not here where we can see them!"

The other reason for poor delivery through the planning system is simply a lack of resources. Planning departments are inadequately skilled to deal with understanding the inevitable overlapping of building science with the more intangible aspects of design. Few planners have the necessary skills or training to be able to adequately assess whether a scheme is truly sustainable or not.

At the large scale, urban design considerations based on reducing carbon emissions can have implications to use and transportation patterns that may require significant and controversial alterations to the local area. Gone are the days of the low-density, spread out, car-dependent models being thought of as viable and desirable. Any large development will require an Environmental Impact Assessment, which may consist of hundreds of pages detailing the social, economic and environmental consequences of the proposal. Few planners are equipped to comprehend and comment on the more technical aspects and so it will be subcontracted out to a multidisciplinary consultant for appraisal.

Building Control departments in local authorities may be better able to understand the technical aspects and check detailed compliance, but without working hand-in-hand with planning departments they are unable to ensure that the larger planning decisions really can work through and deliver carbon emission savings at the detailed implementation stage and on-site. This rarely happens in practice, particularly now that much Building Control is in the hands of private contractors (approved inspectors).

At the small scale, the low charge for submitting a householder application to the local authority and the amount of officer time each application takes to validate, appraise, advertise, notify, visit and write up, makes the economics of determining these applications after appropriate consideration virtually impossible on an ongoing basis.As a consequence the planning system is stretched and doesn't have the capacity or skills to implement the government directives on low carbon buildings on a house-by-house basis.

Recent changes to the General Permitted Development Order were clearly an attempt to address this situation and allow for householders to install certain technologies (wind turbines, solar hot water, photovoltaics, etc.), except in Conservation Areas, without the need for gaining local authority approval at all. This may indeed help a bit, but the majority of the carbon footprint reduction will never come from these active technologies, but instead from improvements to the performance of the overall building fabric. Significant incentives are needed to make it economically advantageous for owners to improve the performance of their homes and this is difficult to achieve with severely strained public finances.

At the individual building scale, the Energy Performance Certificate is a step in the right direction in giving building owners and users a simple understanding of the energy efficiency of the building. With better resources and skills from better funding (and higher planning fees) the planning system may be able to improve on its current performance. But the step change in the carbon emissions from the built environment that we need is simply beyond the current ability of the planning system to deliver it. Perhaps 'Retrofit for the Future' and similar initiatives will provide sufficient technological innovation to achieve our target (super insulating interior paint anyone?). Just don't rely on the planning system to help.

Luke Tozer is Co-Director of Pitman Tozer Architects:
http://www.pitmantozer.com/docs/home.php


The Carbon Trust was set up by the government in 2001 as an independent company, to accelerate the move to a low-carbon economy. It provides businesses and the public sector with advice, finance and accreditation for cutting carbon emissions, and also helps to develop low carbon technologies through project management, investment and collaboration.

The trust oversaw the recent Low Carbon Buildings Programme, in which the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) awarded funding for renewable energy systems to a number of wide-ranging projects across the UK. Anna Halcro-Johnston is Technology Acceleration Manager at the Carbon Trust.

What is the Carbon Trust's involvement in DECC's Low Carbon Buildings Programme?

The Carbon Trust's role is to support and monitor the 23 large projects that were awarded funding through stream 2B of the Department of Energy and Climate Change's (DECC) Low Carbon Buildings Programme (LCBP). Projects secured grants for the installation of micro-generation technologies such as wind turbines, wood-fuelled boilers and ground source heat pumps.

To be eligible for a grant, successful projects had to show energy reductions above and beyond building regulations. This means that the renewable energy technologies are only part of the whole building's low carbon approach. For example, projects include interesting examples of innovative natural ventilation strategies and improved lighting designs.

By monitoring these projects, we aim to understand the successes and failures of delivering low carbon buildings from design to operation. These insights will provide long-term benefits by informing best practice within the industry and helping direct us as to where further support is needed.

Can you give details about some of the projects?

The projects are wide ranging, which makes monitoring them even more interesting. They include everything from zero carbon offices to biomass-fuelled high-rise flats. There are water source heat pumps in the middle of London and a micro hydro-powered residential complex in Oxfordshire.

Our monitoring also sees the results from different development processes. For example, early insights are showing us which contractual processes have been most effective in reducing value engineering, the importance of strong and experienced project managers and how teams interpret regulatory requirements.

What does the Low Carbon Building Accelerator (LCBA) involve?

This is the first programme of its kind to put a magnifying glass on the complete low carbon refurbishment process from the very first design ideas through to the operation and use of the finished building. Where the Low Carbon Buildings Programme deals mainly with new buildings, the Low Carbon Building Accelerator (LCBA) is concerned with existing buildings.

It focuses on gathering data and demonstrating expertise in the energy-efficient refurbishment of non-residential buildings. Projects being supported and monitored include Mark & Spencer's Oxford Street store and the North Wales Police Headquarters. Early insights from the programme have recently been summarised in 'The Low Carbon Refurbishment Guide', which can be downloaded from the Carbon Trust's website.

As expected, the programme is already providing data on the success and viability of a range of low carbon technologies, as well as detailing the refurbishment process from the point of view of the client and contractors. The programme is also providing some unexpected early insights: evidence of endemic commissioning and handover failures; lack of control around unregulated emissions and opportunities around performance contracts.

With regard to the Low Carbon Building Accelerator, how open are non-residential organisations to the prospect of improving energy-efficiency in their buildings?

The LCBA actually started way back in late 2006 which emphasises quite how long some refurbishments can actually take from feasibility to completion. Back then, sites were generally less keen to make commitments around energy reduction and therefore the ten projects we ended up working on were considered progressive in their approach.

The Carbon Trust covers energy-efficient retrofitting as well as new-build technology in its programmes - how important is it to focus on a combination of these methodologies?

To see the sort of carbon reductions that are needed we must ensure that all buildings, new and old, have energy performance at the top of their agenda. All new buildings must be built low-carbon from the start and existing buildings should be brought up to standard as soon as possible.

Due to the task in front of us, we must ensure all bases are covered. This includes everything from supporting the research and development of untested technologies to the practicalities of correctly managing buildings now.

Are sustainability issues now a prime concern for all areas of the building industry?

Building and operation sustainability are definitely prime concerns but are rarely the driving force on a development.

The Carbon Trust will aim to prove that low carbon buildings and refurbishments can be capitally competitive with their energy-hungry relatives. Add to this the operational cost reductions and benefits to occupier comfort and in time we will see every owner specifying low carbon and every user demanding it.

How important is the built environment in achieving a low carbon economy?

The built environment is fundamental to achieving a low carbon economy. Nearly half of all the UK's emissions come from buildings, ensuring that they must play a crucial role in contributing to the legally binding 2050 target (80% cut in carbon emissions).

How effective are Energy Performance Certificates and what results will they have in the long-term?

Energy Performance Certificates provide a relatively simple way to understand how well a building could, and in terms of the Display Energy Certificate (DEC), does perform. The act of undertaking the rating also provides a great chance for energy-saving opportunities to be picked up.

If delivered successfully, this improved awareness could lead to an increased demand for low carbon buildings. However, long-term benefits will be dependent on how widespread DECs become and whether owners and operators will be able to address building inefficiencies once highlighted.

How much carbon can be saved from implementing energy-efficiency measures into the built environment, and will it be enough to meet government targets?

Back in November 2005 the Carbon Trust estimated that by 2020, around 3.8Mt of carbon savings could come from buildings. This, at the time, equated to 22% of total emissions and focused on the existing stock, using cost-effective viable technologies.

In addition to this, the Carbon Trust is currently in the middle of a new piece of work, which aims to understand and detail what needs to happen to enable non-domestic buildings to contribute to the 2050 target. This is due to be launched in the summer of this year.

What we can say now is that there are high expectations from buildings, but meeting them will be difficult without a major change in demand for low carbon buildings and legislation to enforce it. To compound the problem, the results of the LCBA show us that reality rarely reflects the potential. Good intentions are regularly chipped away at during building delivery and handover from areas such as poor commissioning, spiralling unregulated load and a lack of user training. Designing in energy-saving measures from the start is obviously important, but should only be considered as a step towards the whole low carbon solution.

Will the current economic climate affect people's willingness to implement energy-efficiency measures in buildings or do you think the promise of long-term financial savings will actually encourage such activity?

We are seeing both sides to this. There are certainly many that understand the opportunity provided by reducing their operating costs, now more than ever. However, some are nervous of any capital expenditure in the current climate. The other disruptive factor is that energy-saving is often part of greater development plans and refurbishments. As these are put on hold, so the energy-reduction improvements get stalled alongside.

Our advice to owners is to continue to appraise whole lifecycle costs when considering new energy-saving measures, and be vigilant against the false economy of value engineering. Particularly when it comes to the specification of a building's fabric and energy services.

How will the Carbon Trust adapt to meet the needs of future low carbon building projects?

The Carbon Trust already considers decarbonising buildings as an area of importance and our current range of work around buildings reflects this. This includes everything from low carbon design advice through to interest-free loans for energy-efficiency projects. As we move towards 2050 we must continue to be strategic and intelligent in the long term needs, and both practical and relevant with our activities now. It is likely that our activities will continue to fall into three broad areas: increasing demand for low carbon buildings; informing legislative requirements; and improving the quality of the resulting buildings.

It is clear that energy reduction from buildings provides a huge opportunity but also one of the biggest challenges. If we are to get near to realising this opportunity, then it will take drive and effort from all. This means active involvement, from a company's chairman through to its facilities managers. It means influence from government policy advisors through to local authority building control. And it means the Carbon Trust working alongside and closely with the whole of the buildings industry. Anything less and we won't succeed.

For more information about the Carbon Trust and its work, visit:
http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/default.ct

 


Quattro Design Architects

Established 1984, Quattro Design Architects has offices in Bristol and Gloucester, working primarily in the South West, South Wales and Midlands regions. The practice has extensive experience in housing, community, health and education projects, with its major clients being housing associations, local authorities, health authorities and community groups.

Areas of subject specialisation are developed within the practice, and this expertise is then made available to all, enabling a widespread sharing of knowledge, whilst every building that the company works on is subjected to both environmental and access audits at the design stage. Quattro is also experienced in both new-build and remodelling/refurbishment of existing buildings (of all types). In terms of new-build projects, the company has experience in designing a wide range of schemes, from tight urban sites to sensitive designs in conservation areas and rural settings.

Read the full story on the Forum


Eight Associates

Eight Associates is an environmental consultancy that focuses on delivering sustainable buildings, both in the UK and abroad. The company has vast experience in eco-rating systems, such as BREEAM, the Code for Sustainable Homes, EcoHomes, LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and the SEEDA (South East England Development Agency) checklist. As well as offering environmental assessments in these systems, other services include planning statements, renewable energy, research, training and development, and consultation workshops. Its regular client-base includes organisations such as: Quintain Estates Development, Berkley Homes, Grosvenor, the Zoological Society of London, Arup and several local authorities.

Read the full story on the Forum


Pitman Tozer Architects

Pitman Tozer Architects are a small design practice working on a variety of jobs, many of which have a low energy aspect. Their projects range from private houses and private clients to social and affordable housing, and commercial projects. On a number of these, Pitman Tozer has worked with the sustainability team of design and engineering firm Arup.

One such project was the Gap House, which was shortlisted for the Grand Designs Eco House of the Year 2008, and recently won a RIBA award. This was a new-build house based on a small, narrow urban site in West London. It was designed with the aim of minimising the property's carbon footprint and determining the most cost-effective methods of achieving an environmentally friendly house in the limited space available. The finished design incorporated energy efficient features such as passive solar design, a highly insulated building envelope, a ground source coupled heat pump and a rainwater harvesting system. With a budget of £500k the building was designed to use approximately one third of the energy of a traditional new-build house constructed to current building regulations.

Read the full story on the Forum


Mackellar Architecture

Mackellar Architecture is a Tyneside-based medium-sized chartered practice, with a multi-faceted approach, having taken a policy decision to broaden the base of its activity more than ten years ago.

Primarily, the firm focuses on urban design and large-scale masterplanning (as well as transport architecture accessibility, health and community care buildings, and conservation projects), and aims to constantly build upon the ever-increasing knowledge base surrounding sustainability, refurbishment and low/zero carbon housing.

Read the full story on the Forum


Geoff Beardsley & Partners

Having undertaken a range of projects, Geoff Beardsley & Partners are a multi-disciplinary practice with landscaping and interior skills. The company offers a variety of architectural and related services, and works primarily on larger residential buildings, religious and listed buildings, office developments, mixed-use developments, health and safety and CDM (Construction, Design and Management) co-ordination for a major social housing organisation. As well as these, the firm has also undertaken special one-off projects like the refurbishment of a disused school building into a nursery space and the designing of a modern restaurant building.

Read the full story on the Forum

 

If you have selected to read any of the above case studies you will be aware that they are posted on our forum. Our forum was created to enable discussion, and case studies are posted in order to facilitate dialogue surrounding these topics.

In addition to this the forum allows members to begin their own discussions. In the 'Low Energy Buildings Innovation Forum' area you are able to post your own threads or respond to those that have been begun by others. This facility provides a fantastic opportunity for knowledge transfer and a great networking opportunity to find the right people to work with your organisation.

If you would like to make full use of the forum please register yourself with a username at http://www.carbon-innovation.com/discussion/

Sustainable timber structures

Becker-Haus build bespoke natural solid timber houses using sustainable materials, and its timber is taken from renewable domestic forests. Sustainability and environmental concerns are of the highest importance to the company, and energy efficiency both inside and outside the buildings it produces are planned in detail. Energy use in Becker homes is minimised through the company's unique ventilation technology and an integrated heat recovery system. Heating is usually achieved via a heat pump, though the company also offers a wood and solar-based heating solution.
http://www.becker-haus.com/en/becker-haus/

Photovoltaics

Solamax is a new range of tandem photovoltaics (PV) from Kingspan. The panels are thin film PV, and the tandem technology guarantees high energy yields, even in adverse conditions (such as partial overshadow and high temperatures). In many cases, the tandem technology system will guarantee yields of up to 10% more than equivalent silicon crystalline products. The Solamax frame is constructed of pre-compressed solar glass, which ensures high transparency and also protects against extreme weather conditions, including hail, snow and ice.
http://www.kingspansolar.com/solamax/default.shtml

Financial services

The Ecology Building Society is a financial services institution that promotes an ecological approach to the built environment and encourages sustainability. Its lending is governed by sustainable development, and the environmental benefit and impact of each potential loan (in terms of energy use, pollution and saving resources) underpins its lending decisions. Building features encouraged by the company when mortgage lending include: use of reclaimed stone/brick/slate/timber, locally sourced materials, easily recyclable materials, high levels of insulation, and efficient condensing boilers.
http://www.ecology.co.uk/index.htm

Solar thermal heating

Syntonic is a London-based family-run business, installing domestic solar heating. The company offers a full assessment and installation service, and can audit energy needs (solar thermal heating requirements differ for each property, and are based on a number of factors), design an energy renewables system, and supply and install the necessary equipment. The company also offers energy performance information and can monitor energy requirements using web-based or stand-alone software. http://www.solarheating.uk.net/index.htm

Get Involved!

We want to hear from you! To share your story in the bulletin call Tristan on +44 (0) 1883 344 799 or email tristan@carbon-innovation.com - Press releases welcome!

If you wish us to consider including any other information in the bulletin (tender information / job opportunities / blogs) please send details to the same address or call on +44 (0) 1883 344 799


COPYRIGHT NOTICE
- Copyright 2009 Enterprise Events Ltd.
Reproduction of all or part of this Bulletin by third parties is forbidden. Properly accredited articles (always including source details and citing www.carbon-innovation.com) or entire single issues of the Bulletin, including this copyright notice, may be forwarded to individuals as long as it is made clear that to receive a regular copy, people must subscribe individually. For queries about article reproduction, syndication or other copyright issues please email copyright@carbon-innovation.com

To unsubscribe from the Low Energy Buildings Bulletin please email unsubscribe.lebif@carbon-innovation.com