CLICK HERE FOR FREE SUBSCRIPTION


Issue No. 68 ~ 11 December 2008

Contents

Q&A - Interview with a low carbon leader:
- Marcus Armes, CRed

Case studies and best practice:
- Rofin Sinar
- PS Transport
- Newport City Council

Research:
Water Efficiency in the Carbon Economy
- membership survey

Networking Opportunities:
- Low Carbon Best Practice Exchange
- CleanTech Innovation Forum
- Low Energy Buildings Innovation Forum

Low Carbon Board Report:
- Signed, Sealed, Delivered – The Carbon Label

The CRed (Carbon Reduction) Programme is part of the Low Carbon Innovation Centre based at the University of East Anglia in Norwich. CRed works with businesses, individuals and local authorities to generate carbon saving measures which lead to its partners achieving a 60 per cent reduction in carbon dioxide levels by 2020. Although CRed is broadly a community-based programme it has a very active consultancy wing.

Marcus Armes has responsibility for business development and government liaison within the CRed team. Before joining CRed Marcus worked in environmental chemistry and later went on to spend three years as a parliamentary researcher, writing speeches and briefing documents on science issues for various MPs. He uses his political links to deliver the expertise gained from CRed to policy makers at all levels of government.

Is CRed a local, community-based service or an international business-oriented organisation?

"We have always believed that it is important to be seen to be working with communities all over the world, as climate change is very much an international challenge. Also the international dimension adds weight when we are trying to convince local householders and businesses that they need to do their bit to combat climate change.

"To be able to say we are working with the Chinese and Americans gives people a sense that they are part of a much bigger movement when they sign up to carbon reduction activities.

"To date we have worked with around 100 businesses at both local and national levels, and our clients include household names such as E.ON, HSBC and Norwich Union. Perhaps our most unusual project to date as been our work with the brewer Adnams on the UK's first carbon neutral beer, East Green.

"However, we reach more householders through the adoption of our carbon reduction pledging system by local authorities, such as Birmingham and Essex. Currently we have over 100,000 UK householders signed up to over 300,000 pledges. We also work closely with grassroots organisations, such as Groundwork, as we are keen to deliver our message to the less well off, whose need to use energy efficiently is often more based on keeping bills down than lofty aspirations about saving the planet.

"Our work in China is now largely based around partnerships with Chinese universities, such as Fudan in Shanghai who are running a CRed programme on their campus. The intention is to spin this out to the city itself and this very much fits in with our ethos of universities taking the lead on action on climate change in their host communities."

Who funds CRed?

"Initially CRed was funded by the East of England Development Agency (EEDA) to lift the profile of the climate change issues with businesses and to assist in driving forward a low carbon economy in the region. And indeed at the time of our launch back in 2003 carbon reduction still had a fairly low profile.

"However, the last of our EEDA funding ran out in 2006 and since then we have broadened our funding base with some money coming from corporate organisations such as HSBC, but the majority of our funding now comes through consultancy work with the corporate sector and the sale of the CRed System and carbon reduction strategy to local authorities.

"Whilst in some respects this has taken us away from our community roots, in other ways working with the commercial world has enabled us to get involved in projects which introduce new communities to low carbon thinking.

"For example, our work with E.ON on their Carbonfootyprint campaign encouraged football fans to offset the emissions arising from their teams' participation in the FA Cup. We are also working with the National Endowment for Science Technology and the Arts (NESTA) on their £1 million Big Green Challenge fund which to date has created 10 community-based projects."

Please tell us about your links with the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia

"The founding father of CRed was Professor Trevor Davies who was formerly Director of CRU, so our links with both CRU and the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, which shares a building at UEA with CRed, are very close indeed.

"Obviously having a large number of leading climate scientist on our doorstep is a massive plus for us, as it lends us credibility and enables us to pick the brains of real experts when technical issues arise. Unsurprisingly this has led to a number of environmental consultancies asking us to partner them in bids for funded work on climate change strategies and carbon reduction."

What initiatives with the business community have you undertaken?

"As well as the ventures with E.ON and Adnams I mentioned earlier we have been involved in a host of small scale initiatives with business large and small. These range from simply supplying articles on carbon reduction and climate change issues, to hands-on carbon auditing aimed at helping a business identify where best to make efficiencies which reduce their carbon footprint.

"We are currently working with the building giant Barratt Homes and developer Building Partnerships on planning an eco community on the outskirts of Norwich."

What about work with the agricultural sector?

"The agriculture sector is a major contributor to the basket of greenhouse gas emissions but it also offers great opportunities to mitigate climate change. CRed has just finished a piece of work funded by Natural England to refine the development of an on-line tool to assist farmers reduce their carbon footprint. We have also just completed an in-depth analysis of the carbon footprint of the RSPB's Hope Farm in Cambridgeshire.

"We are also working with Norwich City Council and various European partners on a European funded project to look at the impact of biofuels in vehicle fleets. This work is probably the closest we come to undertaking pure research, so don't be surprised to see the CRed logo on some of the City's buses when you next visit Norwich."

How do you engage the local community?

"Largely through the CRed Pledge System I mentioned earlier. However the CRed team attend numerous events, such as agricultural shows, and give hundreds of talks and presentations to community groups, councils and schools. Really there is no substitute for face-to-face contact when it comes to putting over the climate change message."

Of which low carbon achievements are you particularly proud?

"I would have to say the Carbonfootyprint campaign which engaged tens of thousands of football fans in carbon reduction. Dr Simon Gerrard and I came up with the idea and we trialled the scheme with Ipswich Town FC and E.ON loved the project and rolled it out across the FA Cup competition. I am an avid Norwich City fan so working with Ipswich did not come easy, but credit to them and Ipswich Borough Council for running with the idea and making it such a success."

Are the revised Government carbon reduction targets achievable?

"Yes, but we must start now and ensure that resources are available and bring the public along with us. We have the technology to achieve a low carbon economy but we must build the collective will."

What is the biggest obstacle to a low carbon economy?

"It is people's resistance to, and fear of, change."

What are you working on right now?

"We are heavily involved in carbon footprinting the built environment. On the more behavioural side CRed is still enjoying working with NESTA on the their Big Green Challenge fund, as this keeps us up to speed with how communities are tackling carbon reduction. On a personal note I am continuing to focus in on working with politicians from all parties to put across the learning we have picked up from five years working with both the public and business on carbon reduction."

What advice do you have for fellow low-carbon pioneers?

"Get out there and talk to people about practical carbon reduction measures and explain how these measures can help reduce their bills, secure their energy supply and ensure that their children inherit a world worth living in."

CRed can be contacted on http://www.cred-uk.org/

Please send any questions you have for future "Q&A" interviewees to: editor@carbon-innovation.com .



Rofin Sinar

Rofin Sinar manufacture industrial lasers and laser-based solutions for materials processing worldwide and has a staff of 90 people working in their UK site in Hull. Approximately 20% of staff are employed in admin while the remaining 80% are all focussed on production.

This production process is heavily energy intensive and as demand has increased and the company has grown this has forced an examination of the carbon output associated with the business. This has involved development of novel processes to combat existing energy usage and has resulted in substantial savings in power consumption

Read the full story on the Forum

 

PS Transport

PS Transport is a family run haulage firm operating out of Humberside and making deliveries nationwide. With a fleet operating 24 hours a day seven days a week fuel costs are one of the company's largest expenses. Since 1997 they have looked at a number of strategies to reduce emissions and improve efficiency throughout their fleet.

The earliest development for the company was in providing support to research being carried by the University of Huddersfield. This was aimed at understanding the different factors affecting the miles per gallon (mpg) achieved by the fleet. Daily fuel data was supplied to the university and then analysed to determine how factors such as training or the use of technology impacted consumption. Close monitoring of routes taken, driving styles, idling time and a range of other factors were incorporated to give an overall picture of vehicle use.

Read the full story on the Forum

 

Newport City Council

Newport City Council has taken a multi-step approach to delivering ‘green IT’, with a view very much towards the future and the benefits that implementing change at an early stage can bring. Tracy McKim, Infrastructure Manager at the council, explained that the ‘push’ factors driving the changes were related to industry research stating that ‘greener’ IT will become increasingly important and increasingly effective over the next two years.

“However,” says Ms McKim, “the planning and cost assessment needs to start now in the context of the overall IT strategy. Therefore the spend in the current year will make best use of the technologies already available, and start the planning process for investments in future years.

Read the full story on the Forum


Water Efficiency
in the Carbon Economy
By Tristan Parker

Sustainability concerns are now a key part of the environmental outlook of many organisations, and measurement of a carbon footprint - and making efforts to reduce carbon emissions and general energy wastage - has become standard practice for many organisations, be they large or small, public or private sector.

However, one factor that is only now starting to be taken into account in the sustainability sphere is water use. Strangely, for such a crucial and fundamental resource, water is still not seen as a commodity worth protecting on a wide scale, but this viewpoint is changing rapidly and it seems likely that calculating the 'water footprint' of an organisation will soon become as common as measuring a carbon footprint.

Examining a survey conducted in 2007 by the Marsh Centre for Risk Insights reveals a widespread attitude to the problem. The survey found that 40% of Fortune 1000 companies said that a water shortage would have a severe or catastrophic impact on their business, yet only 17% of the same companies said they were prepared for such an event.

Although prevalent, this attitude is one that looks set to be replaced with much-needed attention to the issue, especially when considering that the repercussions of a water shortage are so wide-ranging, encompassing political, social and economic factors.

Taking into account some of the insights gained from carbon footprinting, an examination of water use within the public and private sector allows us to see that the problem is not one that lies exclusively with the internal operations of an organisation, but also with the supply chain of that organisation.

Large multinational companies are increasingly recognising this fact, and are working to reduce the water-impact of their supply chains. PepsiCo, for example, appear to have realised the environmental and financial value of saving water on a large scale, and have publicly committed to lowering their water footprint by using less water throughout their supply chain.

This examination of the supply chain is crucial. As is being increasingly recognised within carbon measurement and carbon reduction initiatives (as demonstrated in the work of organisations such as the Carbon Disclosure Project), supply chain monitoring is essential, with factors such as packaging and travel often being responsible for a large proportion of an individual product's water footprint.

Water used in the production supply chain can be classed as 'embedded water', which is contrasted with 'operational water' - water used directly by an organisation (though this term can also refer to domestic water use), in - for example - the washing of company vehicles, cooking and cleaning in a staff canteen, etc…

To give an idea of the effect of supply chain influence on the overall water footprint of a single product, it is worth noting that around 140 litres of water, much of it embedded, are required to produce one cup of coffee, and one kilogram of beef requires around 16,000 litres of water in total.

The supply chain footprint is a vital component of water footprinting, but what must also be taken into account is the end-use footprint. This is the water level which results from use of a product at its final destination (usually the consumer). For example, consider the water wastage incurred in washing with a bar of soap.

It is crucial to remember that although both supply chain and end-use water may not appear to be the direct responsibility of an organisation, such organisations have a very significant part to play in cutting down on this use. To ignore these factors is to ignore a large part of the problem, and it is increasingly seen as essential to a solid corporate and social responsibility ethos to account for and work towards decreasing them.

Additional to these factors is an increased strain upon global water supplies. Water shortages, of differing scales, are becoming increasingly common in both the developing world and advanced economies, and as such, another factor to consider is how and from where your organisation's water is sourced. Again, in keeping with general corporate social responsibility aims, the best policy to adopt is to source from areas which do not have a history of water supply issues, including UK-based areas as well as abroad. Though the UK may not appear to be in danger of a full-scale drought, some areas are far more prone to water shortages than others.

At present, climate change concerns tend to focus in on energy and carbon emissions, but the fact that water supplies are not as secure as once thought means that before long, water conservation will be viewed with equal value, and will also be moved to the forefront of climate change agendas, in both domestic and industry circles.

Some companies have already begun to tackle the problems associated with water supplies: potato-processing company Walkers is reducing its water consumption by around 50% at its Leicester sites through taking a number of progressive steps.

The company recognised that in order to successfully reduce its water consumption, water levels first had to be measured. A total of 30 water meters were installed at the site and after use was measured, engineering solutions were drawn up. One of the strategies was to recycle water used in the starch recovery programme during the manufacturing process, saving an estimated 400 million litres of water.

Crucially, Walkers also recognised that changing staff behaviour was essential in ensuring the longevity of its plans; a crucial line of support in any environmental policy.

All the steps taken by the company have resulted in water consumption per kilogram of potatoes processed being halved at two plants, and PepsiCo, of whom Walkers are a subsidiary, has also pledged to achieve zero water intake at its Walkers' manufacturing sites within ten years.

Cadbury Trebor Bassett, another food manufacturer, has also taken steps to reduce water use, based around re-using effluent (waste water) created in the manufacturing process. Water is used by the company in a large range of activities throughout the production process, and due to the addition of an onsite water treatment plant, effluent can now be re-used for certain tasks. The company has now reduced demand for water use by around 15% per year, creating an annual saving of approximately £10,000.

Clearly, water reduction must be pushed further forward in the environmental agenda, both on a personal and commercial level. As with carbon reduction, excess water management can be applied on a large or small scale (i.e. for a department or an entire company), but as seen in the above examples, initial awareness followed by measurement - via water footprinting - are crucial in order for the most effective action to be taken.

Reducing water usage and waste water can and should be seen as complementary to existing or planned carbon-lowering initiatives and wider environmental policies, and as the idea of transparency continues to play a larger and larger part in the public and corporate image of an organisation, it seems that giving attention to these important issues is a necessary and progressive step for all forward-thinking organisations.

________________________________________________________________

The Low Carbon Innovation Network has found that carbon reduction strategies include changes in many areas of an organisation, and feedback from our members shows that water efficiency is a key aspect.

The network hopes to determine the progression of improvements in water efficiency through our 2008 Water Efficiency in the Carbon Economy Survey, and would very much appreciate your input. The survey (accessed through the link below) takes about 10 minutes to complete, and we will email a copy of the final report to those kind enough to complete it.

To access the survey please click here

Many Thanks, we look forward to your response  



Networking Opportunities

A national programme of Low Carbon Best Practice Exchange meetings are staged across the UK. These highly acclaimed networking events provide an effective way for organisations, from both the private and public sectors, to progress their own plans for carbon reduction initiatives.

The CleanTech Innovation Forum is the partnering event for all those involved in developing renewable energy and other environmental technologies to discuss innovations, fast-track technology transfer, explore collaboration opportunities, offer capabilities and seek funding/licensing agreements.

The Low Energy Buildings Innovation Forum is the newly launched structured networking event for architects, building engineers, facilities managers and other specifiers, to meet-up with suppliers of building products and systems. The purpose is to review the latest innovations for low energy buildings, explore renewable energy options and share best practice on ways to reduce carbon emissions in the built environment.


Signed, Sealed, Delivered – The Carbon Label

Along with its more familiar ingredients, Black Label beer from Japan’s Sapporo breweries will in future list a new piece of information – the amount of carbon dioxide emitted in producing each can.

Consumers will learn that each 350-ml can releases 161 grams of the greenhouse gas in the production process. This covers output from all stages of manufacture and distribution, including emissions from fertilizers, grain, transportation, refrigeration and recycling.

The Sapporo move, the first by a private company in Japan, is part of a government-backed initiative to encourage carbon footprint labelling across Japan’s industries and raise public awareness of the footprint of domestic products. It is thought that around 30 companies, including Sapporo, are in discussion with the government about a trial scheme planned for launch next spring. Retailers Aeon, Seven Eleven, Seiyu, Uny, Lawson, and Matsushita Electric are all thought to be involved.

Japan has set a target for a 60% reduction in greenhouse emissions by 2050. However, bringing the private sector on board is proving to be tricky. This summer, plans by Prime Minister Fukuda to meet reduction targets using a cap-and-trade scheme of the kind seen in the EU were opposed by powerful industry groups, including the Japan Business Federation, the Japan Iron and Steel Federation, and the Federation of Electric Power Companies.

Tougher emission targets will force companies to shift their production from Japan to other countries, warned the president of Nippon Steel, the world’s second largest steelmaker behind ArcelorMittal.

PAS 2050 arrives

So in the short term at least, Japan is pinning its hopes on carbon labelling to deliver the reductions it seeks. Whether this will work remains to be seen, but in the UK, work on carbon labelling is also gathering momentum. Led by the Carbon Trust, work in this area splits into two main parts: the BSI British Standards Publicly Available Specification for assessing the life cycle emissions of goods and services (PAS 2050), and a Code of Good Practice for product emissions and reduction claims.

PAS 2050 describes a common approach to assessing the life cycle emissions of goods and services, while the Code of Good Practice sets out requirements for making consistent and credible claims about emissions and reductions measured using PAS 2050. Formally launched in October 2008, PAS 2050 draws on pilot projects with 75 product ranges from companies such as PepsiCo, Boots, Innocent, Marshalls, Tesco, Cadbury, Kimberly Clark, and Coors Brewers.

To build on this work Tesco is deploying the label on 20 of its own-brand products in four different categories: laundry detergent, orange juice, potatoes and light bulbs. The label tells customers how much greenhouse gas is produced throughout the life of each product, including use and disposal. On some products the label includes advice for customers on how they can reduce emissions, such as washing clothes at a lower temperature, for example. To support the label, Tesco has launched a ‘Greener Living’ website and booklets in its larger stores.

A key driver behind the decision to go ahead with carbon labels was consumer research carried out by Tesco in 2006, says sustainability manager Katherine Symonds. The research suggested that the environmental impact of products influences the purchase decisions of customers – as has been demonstrated by the market for organic foods – and the growing realisation that small actions can add up to a big difference. “Our experience with plastic carrier bags showed this. We gave out 40% fewer in August 2008 than we did in August 2006,” says Symonds. But the main factor was the concern of customers about global warming, and their interest in having more information about what they could do to help, she says.

Crucially, there were benefits for the company too, says Symonds. “Amazing amounts of knowledge were acquired in doing this. For example, we found that refrigerants accounted for a fifth of the carbon footprint for some products. It gave us valuable insights into issues such as slow leaks of refrigerant gases, for example,” she says.

Low carbon landscape

Although interest in carbon labelling has focused on retailers, one of the most significant achievements in the UK has come from a manufacturer of stone and concrete landscaping products for the construction, home improvement and landscape markets. With a workforce of 3,000, Marshalls operates its own quarries and manufacturing sites, as well as 12 service centres and 14 offices across the UK.

From October 2008, all of Marshalls’ 503 domestic landscaping products will be carbon labelled, possibly the largest number of labelled products from a single company anywhere in the world.

There were several reasons why the company decided to go down this route, says Group Marketing Director Chris Harrop. The public is rapidly becoming better informed about carbon emissions through media coverage of a range of issues, including climate science, the economic impacts predicted by the Stern Review, and the response of governments, says Harrop. Specific policies such as the Carbon Reduction Commitment and the targets it sets out will be a significant challenge for companies that fail to act promptly and thoroughly, he suggests. Last but by no means least, Marshalls has been in business since the 1880s, and plans to be here for a while yet. “We take a forward view of the marketplace, and want to be around in another 120 years,” Harrop says.

Gathering the data needed to label its products required Marshalls to map its supply chain accurately, a tough task. The company’s approach was to do this in two distinct phases. The first involved a small team of four senior staff who drew up a very broad impact and risk assessment, identifying parts of the supply chain where the heaviest production of carbon dioxide is likely to occur. “That looked at obtaining heavy amounts of raw material such as stone, our use of concrete and cement – which has a high carbon footprint – and stone quarried overseas, in India, for example,” says Harrop. In looking at the latter the PAS 2050 methodology was extremely helpful, he says.

The second phase required bringing 60 sites on board, chiefly through site managers. “It wasn’t that onerous as it happens. The big fear is that this will take a lot of time and effort, but PAS 2050 is very pragmatic. The whole process took around 14 months from start to finish,” he says.

In addition to improving the company’s view of its own processes Marshalls has seen considerable outside interest in the labelling scheme, including potential customers. “We’ve had thousands of hits on the carbon calculator on our website, and lots of welcoming feedback from architects, construction companies, and local authorities. We think architects will be more likely to choose our products,” says Harrop.

Overall, Harrop has two pieces of advice for companies considering a labelling scheme. “A lot of the necessary information exists in a business, although it’s not always in the right place or in the right format. Companies are being inundated with emails from consultants offering to help them map their footprints. My advice to anyone going down this route would be to use the Carbon Trust methodology,” he says.

Key questions:

• What emissions data will our customers and partners expect us to provide?
• What moves could our competitors make to satisfy that demand?
• How might carbon labelling help us to become more efficient, and meet our CRC obligations?

Do you have colleagues that might be interested in receiving the Bulletin?

As the size of the Network grows, the opportunities to share best practice just get better!

So please encourage others to enrol on this free-to-join Network, for example other climate change champions and those with energy, sustainability, environment, fleet management, information technology, infrastructure development or corporate responsibility remits.

Please forward a copy of this Bulletin to all you think might be interested.

New members can register for the Bulletin here


We are always grateful to receive any comments or feedback that you have with regards to the Bulletin, the Forum, the Exchange or the Network in general.

We would also like to hear from you if you have a case study for the Bulletin or have a topic that you would like to discuss at a future Best Practice Exchange.

Please email any comments or suggestions to editor@carbon-innovation.com


COPYRIGHT NOTICE
- Copyright 2008 Enterprise Events Ltd.
Reproduction of all or part of this Bulletin by third parties is forbidden. Properly accredited articles (always including source details and citing www.carbon-innovation.com) or entire single issues of the Bulletin, including this copyright notice, may be forwarded to individuals as long as it is made clear that to receive a regular copy, people must subscribe individually. For queries about article reproduction, syndication or other copyright issues please email copyright@carbon-innovation.com

To unsubscribe from the Low Carbon Innovation Bulletin please email unsubscribe@carbon-innovation.com